|
Why is Terry Helvey still in prison? His plea
agreement with the Navy called for no more than five
years' confinement.
The Navy applied tremendous pressure to Mr. Helvey, then
only 20, to secure his plea to a murder charge. His was a capital case,
until that plea. Mr. Helvey's own counsel exhibited a photo of the
electric chair in which, defense counsel said, the Navy proposed to burn
him alive--should he be convicted, as counsel indicated he surely would.
But threats were only part of the inducement to plead.
There were also assurances, conveyed Mr. Helvey directly by the Convening
Authority's Force Judge Advocate, and the Military Judge, that Mr. Helvey
would serve no more than five years.
Yet, having secured Mr. Helvey's plea, by threats of a
grisly death if he went to trial, and by promises of great leniency if he
plead; the Navy now refuses to honor commitments, most solemnly and
authoritatively undertaken. Mr. Helvey has been confined continuously
since 28 October 1992. Even ignoring the Navy's "no more than five years"
commitment, the "Salient Factors" test called for his release after 8
years' and 4 months' confinement, or by 1 March 2001.
Again, why is Mr. Helvey still
confined? Did someone forget about him? "You're
like the garbageman--someone everybody needs, but no one wants around
after the job is done." [Government assassin's lament in
CBS's "Now and Again", 15 October 1999].
The assurances provided Terry Helvey, that he would serve
no more than five years, were given Terry personally, and not through
intermediaries--
• by the Admiral's lawyer (legal officer for the convening
authority); and
• by the military trial judge (the judge presiding at
Terry's court-martial).
On the strength of these commitments, Terry entered his
plea. These are the plain facts of the case. Better than anything, they
illustrate the Navy's involvement in Schindler's murder.
For comparison's sake, Charles Vins, who actually stomped
Schindler to death, received immunity from (further) prosecution; four
months' confinement; forfeiture of pay and allowances; reduction in
grade to E-1; and a bad conduct discharge.
Neither Enforcer lookout was prosecuted for anything. One
received immunity--ostensibly for his testimony against Terry on a
peripheral issue, but really for his role in the murder and for his
silence. It's unknown, at this time, whether the remaining lookout was
immunized or not.
|